Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | ivc | 5-0 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Last Chance #12761383 |
| Unknown Archetype | alexanderrosdahl | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Control | soto_ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | squee_goblin_nabob | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Unknown Archetype | geokh1 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Blink , 4 Color Legends , 5 Color Caves , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Reanimator , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Control , Azorius Flash
Meta Performance Analysis
Beza, the Bounding Spring ranks #269 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 79%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 58.8%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Beza, the Bounding Spring is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 9.05 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 68.6%. Beza, the Bounding Spring has a win rate of 68.1%, making it 0.6% worse than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essence Scatter | Instant | 11 | 84.8% | 5 |
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 13 | 84.7% | 8 |
| Jeskai Revelation | Instant | 9 | 78.6% | 4 |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 18 | 78.1% | 9 |
| Skrelv's Hive | Enchantment | 6 | 77.8% | 3 |
| Rediscover the Way | Enchantment — Saga | 8 | 76.6% | 3 |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 19 | 76.4% | 8 |
| Binding Negotiation | Sorcery | 5 | 69.3% | 0 |
| Invasion of Gobakhan | Battle — Siege // Enchantment | 8 | 68.3% | 3 |
| Zurgo and Ojutai | Legendary Creature — Orc Dragon | 5 | 67.9% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Beza, the Bounding Spring than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exorcise | Sorcery | 2 | 9 | 85.4% | 73.3% | +12.1% |
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 2 | 13 | 83.0% | 72.7% | +10.3% |
| Abrade | Instant | 2 | 11 | 84.5% | 74.8% | +9.7% |
| Flashfreeze | Instant | 2 | 5 | 84.6% | 75.0% | +9.6% |
| Disenchant | Instant | 2 | 5 | 81.2% | 73.1% | +8.2% |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 6 | 21 | 78.7% | 71.9% | +6.8% |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 9 | 77.0% | 70.4% | +6.6% |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 5 | 19 | 77.7% | 71.8% | +5.9% |
| Jeskai Revelation | Instant | 7 | 17 | 77.4% | 71.6% | +5.9% |
| Rediscover the Way | Enchantment — Saga | 3 | 9 | 77.5% | 72.4% | +5.2% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 934 | 71.7% | 47.3% |
| Mono White Tokens | 597 | 98.5% | 45.7% |
| Azorius Control | 354 | 96.7% | 53.9% |
| Selesnya Beanstalk | 59 | 92.2% | 43.1% |
| Selesnya Cage | 57 | 22.8% | 53.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.